When Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang told the Financial Times that China could “win the AI race,” it reflected a tension simmering beneath global technology politics. Although Huang later softened his stance, his remark captured the essence of a growing dilemma: the world’s most valuable chipmaker now finds itself squeezed between two superpowers — the United States and China. Each is using Nvidia’s AI chip restrictions as a strategic weapon, and the company’s efforts to balance both sides may end up pleasing neither.
From Market Leader to Market Exit
Just a year ago, Nvidia commanded nearly 95% of China’s AI accelerator market. Today, that figure has fallen to zero. Speaking at a Citadel Securities event, Huang confirmed that Nvidia no longer includes China in its sales forecasts. This collapse isn’t a small setback — China once accounted for about a quarter of Nvidia’s data center revenue, a segment that generated over US$41 billion in the company’s most recent earnings report.
The latest blow came when reports revealed that the White House blocked Nvidia from selling its B30A AI chip to China. The B30A, a scaled-down version of its flagship processors, was specifically designed to comply with U.S. export rules while still being capable of training advanced AI models. But Washington refused to approve the sale, signaling a tougher stance on any product that could potentially enhance China’s AI capabilities.
On the other side, Beijing has responded in kind, introducing new policies that prohibit state-funded data centers from using foreign-made AI chips. Projects that are less than 30% complete must now remove imported hardware or cancel their plans altogether. This two-front pressure leaves Nvidia trapped in a geopolitical vice — blocked from selling in China by both governments simultaneously.
A Lobbying Gamble That Backfired
Huang has long argued that keeping China dependent on American chip technology ultimately benefits U.S. interests. His reasoning was simple: as long as Chinese AI development relies on Nvidia’s ecosystem, America maintains a strategic advantage.
For a brief moment, it seemed this argument had gained traction. After Huang met with President Trump in July, reports suggested Washington might ease export restrictions in exchange for a 15% tax on Nvidia and AMD’s Chinese revenues. However, optimism quickly faded. Beijing launched its own national security review of Nvidia’s products, effectively blocking them from the market altogether.
The irony is hard to ignore — while Huang was lobbying the U.S. to open up sales, China was already slamming the door shut. His comments comparing China’s pro-industry energy subsidies to Western overregulation further highlighted Nvidia’s delicate position. The company needs cooperation from both Washington and Beijing but operates in a world where favoring one often means alienating the other.
Nationalism Reshapes the AI Landscape
The chip war between the U.S. and China is no longer just about trade; it’s about technological sovereignty. China’s latest directive to exclude foreign chips has accelerated investment in domestic alternatives. Since 2021, Chinese authorities have poured over US$100 billion into AI infrastructure, fueling a new generation of local chipmakers.
Companies like Huawei, Cambricon, MetaX, Moore Threads, and Enflame are now racing to replace Nvidia’s dominance. While these firms cannot yet match Nvidia’s performance or software stack, they have one crucial advantage: protection. With state backing, guaranteed demand, and reduced foreign competition, these players have the breathing room to innovate and expand.
The geopolitical divide is also shifting global AI development. Western nations are doubling down on innovation within their own borders, while China pushes aggressively toward technological independence. Nvidia, once a unifying platform for global AI research, now finds itself symbolizing the fragmentation of the digital age.
When Compliance Isn’t Enough
Nvidia has made repeated attempts to comply with U.S. export controls by designing lower-performance chips tailored for the Chinese market. But the B30A controversy shows how even compliant designs can be rejected on political grounds. The chip was engineered to stay below the computational thresholds set by Washington’s export laws, yet it still failed to pass approval.
At the same time, Beijing has grown increasingly suspicious of any foreign technology used in critical AI infrastructure. Even if Nvidia managed to design a chip acceptable to Washington, it would still face restrictions from Chinese regulators. In short, Nvidia can no longer find middle ground.
This reveals a harsh truth: in today’s tech landscape, there are no neutral suppliers. Every company building advanced AI hardware must align — directly or indirectly — with a national strategy.
The End of the China Dream
Huang has publicly acknowledged this new reality. Nvidia’s latest financial guidance assumes zero revenue from China, with any potential sales treated as “bonus” income rather than a strategic forecast. This conservative stance may reassure investors but signals that Nvidia no longer sees China as a viable near-term market.
For China, the exclusion of Nvidia is both a challenge and an opportunity. It will accelerate domestic chip innovation but could slow AI progress in the short term. Meanwhile, U.S. tech companies — including Microsoft, Google, and Amazon — continue to invest hundreds of billions in data centers powered by Nvidia’s most advanced processors, widening the technological gap between the two ecosystems.
For Nvidia, the path forward lies in doubling down on allies: the United States, Europe, Japan, South Korea, and Southeast Asia. As geopolitical barriers harden, Nvidia’s future depends on markets that align both politically and economically with American interests.
Technology’s New Divide
The AI race is no longer about who builds the best chip — it’s about who controls access to computing power itself. Nvidia’s journey from 95% dominance in China to total exclusion is a case study in how geopolitics can overturn even the most successful business strategy.
In the coming years, companies across the AI industry will face the same question: Which side are you on?
The Nvidia AI chip ban, enforced from both Washington and Beijing, underscores that neutrality is no longer an option. Those who hesitate to choose may find the decision made for them.
Nvidia’s fall in China marks not just a loss of revenue but the end of an era — when technology could exist above politics. In this new age of digital nationalism, every chip is a statement of allegiance, and every innovation carries geopolitical weight.
Leave a Reply